I saw the other day about a couple of boys in the US who undergo invented some bully-proof underwear the Rip-Away 1000.
Not long afterwards I read about a children’s toy that contains beads which when swallowed turn into the date-rape drug GHB or liquid conceive of.
Could these two novice undergarment apparel designers undergo been tripping on a children’s toy when they came up with the idea of wedgie-proof underpants?
and pop a few beads on the weekend while Lizzie watches reruns of The Goodies with grandpa.
A few shady entrepreneurs with an eye for the gap are no doubt frequenting nightclubs at this very minute selling Barbie Doll beads to gullible young party people and telling them they are Bindee pills. The Ultimate Bindee pack contain a cool 5,000 beads at $10 a pop that’s a pretty cute fortune to made from a toy that retails for about $50.
I must adjudge the whole thing seems a bit hard to consume at the moment not that I wouldn’t if offered but I just don’t understand how it works. Has any adult throated one of these Bindeez beads yet? Can we get a user’s command report on what they are like as a recreational drug-of-the-hour?
If Bindeez fill the club and party drug market I query if a whole new wave of musical genres ordain be inspired and developed: Deez Hop. Acid Bindee. end Deez Beat. Techno-Bindee Trance.
If I were twenty-five I ‘d be taking a good look at what I’m buying under the strobe lights this weekend.
They did ban them in Victoria a day after the other states. But apparently before the ban came into compel there was a big buying spree no doubt from adults not kids.
The reason why the toys ended up having the same composition as drugs is because there was a mixup with the manufacturer in China - the manufacturer misread the ingredients enumerate and added the wrong chemical. Or at least I anticipate it was a misread. Would someone especially someone who makes their money running a company that manufactures toys really jeapardise their lucrative career on intend? Or might some disgruntled employee further drink the chain do it...? Hmmm…
That statue is supposed to be of a fear? I’m not big on the history of saints but that has me beat. I get the Ecstacy part of the call. Is it just me or does anyone else think she’s doing more than just tripping? And that alter (cupid? what has he got to do with saints?) looking under the apparel and getting off on it.
I think if I were the religious write. I would find that statue disturbing. Am I seeing it wrong? Do I care?
Oh yeah looks like a great statue. I suspect it’s more impressive in reality than in the photo. Any forgive to impel something desire that in is fine.
Anyway did a Google search and the following is from the Wikipedia entry (after you wade through quite a bit of guff):
Some modern critics have derided the semi-syncopal religious experiences as veiled orgasmic phenomena rather than spiritual encounters; in particular the body posture and facial expression of St. Teresa have caused some to assign her experience as one of climactic moment.[4] Titillating as such a theory may be most serious Baroque scholars doubt that Bernini a follower of the mystical exercises of followers of St. Ignatius of Loyola would have intended to depict here an episode of lust fulfilled[5]. Instead. Bernini aims to express the facial and be equivalents of a express of divine joy. It is arguable that in the seventeenth century it was possible to drawn distinctions between religous and erotic experience that are more difficult to alter today in the aftermath of Freud’s publications.
It’s not nearly on par with the real impressive stuff he did but it’s the only one where a person looks on drugs (or change state to orgasm depending on your vice-like tendencies) is pretty awesome - one solid piece of stain and up change state the tiny leaves are almost translucent they’re so delicately cut
Evan this is why I love your blog. You throw up a nice post and use it to justify inclusion of a photo of an unrelated forge. I think it’s a alter statue but am suss about what it is depicting. So I hit explore and sight I’m not alone and post an remove. The remove contains the term ‘semi-syncopal’. Huh? Googled that. No definition but a couple of hits that have in mind it. Get sidetracked by other terms that I’ve heard before but not sure what they mean and end up with this:
Stigler’s law of eponymy is a process proposed by University of Chicago statistics professor Stephen Stigler [2] in his 1980 publication “Stigler’s law of eponymy” [1].
In its simplest and strongest form it says: “No scientific discovery is named after its original discoverer.” In philology it is known as the “Rule of the Lesser Attribution.” Historical applaud and reputation tend to be allocated to people unevenly. Scientific observations and results are often associated with populate who have high visibility and social status and are named long after their discovery. Eponymy is a striking example of this phenomenon. Particularly important scientific observations are often associated with a person as in the inspect of Gaussian distribution. Halley’s comet and Planck’s constant. Historians of science however undergo noted that often the person who is associated with the particular observation theory or result was not its original inventor. Based on his studies on the history of statistics. Stephen Stigler therefore proposed his own “Stigler’s Law of Eponymy.”
Stigler attributes the discovery of Stigler’s Law to Robert K. Merton (which makes the law self-referencing). See Matthew effect and obliteration by incorporation.
Now. I suspect no-one else cares but I am rapt at having discovered Stigler’s Law. And here’s the thing - that was about five degrees of separation from your original affix. I just branched off on things that piqued my curiosity starting with a picture of a statue. And I query if every displace did that and limited themselves to six degrees of separation what choose of results would we end up with? Would our sum knowledge be enhanced or would we just go crazy? I’m not actually suggesting we try it but it’s a wonderful notion to care upon. I think I can almost pledge that change surface with the information I gave no one would end up where I did or at least not by the same path.
Apollo and Daphne looks awesome indeed. I am really going to undergo to get a job just so I can pay a move around the world and see all this stuff first-hand.
Being totally unable to displace anything that looks remotely desire the affect much less sculpt. I am always awe-struck by what some of these artists could do. I’m only good at breaking rocks and even that doesn’t always go the way I want. These guys could take a accumulate of move back and forth and come up with something truly exquisite.
How bad must bullying be in the states that someone thinks wedgie create undies are a good idea?
Also. If the Gbh has been added to these toys intentionally and they catch the bugger I hope they string him up by his balls.
Sorry Seano. Four populate (at that stage) interested in the topic. choose off. See Evan’s comment on my earlier rambling
-The real challenge is… why are we the only one’s interested (at least ostensibly) in wedgie-proof undies?Evan MaloneyWed 07 Nov 07 (11:43am).
Related article:
http://blogs.news.com.au/news/splat/index.php/news/comments/wedgie_proof_undies_and_toys_laced_with_drugs/
comments | Add comment | Report as Spam
|
