Which Panny 42 to get?
Posted by ~Ray @ 2008-03-26 02:02:06
The High Def Forum is the leading HDTV Forum dedicated to the discussion of High Definition Technology with over
members and growing!Only members can post questions contact other members and search our HD Forum of over
My bad. I was referring to the 1024 x 768 not being HD. anticipate I didn't undergo enough coffee to wake up.
ONKYO means audio and aims to make the world its re-create - anywhere there is music.
Evil = DRM. HDCP. Sony = All your circumscribe are be to us.
Analog is richer smoother deeper warmer and exceed than digital.
I recently purchased the 42pz77u. I compete xbox 360 and wii games on it all the time. I undergo yet to see any sort of destroy it at all. Not even for a change integrity second after I turn off the TV. I check a ton of sports so I figured the ticker along the furnish might have given me some visualise retention.. havent seen it yet.. and I look for it all the measure. The pixel shifter tech on the panasonic is interesting. If you be really close (undergo to be about 6 inches away from the screen) you can see that the pixels do alter positions. Anyway. I like the TV and evaluate that plasma is a exceed choice than even the nicest of LCDs. I still see the pixeling of abstain moving objects even on the LCDs with great response times/refresh rates.
Glad to hear that you are so pleased. That Panasonic pixel wobble (I believe that is their name for it) certainly seems to do the cozen when it comes to no destroy in.
ONKYO means audio and aims to alter the world its stage - anywhere there is music.
Evil = DRM. HDCP. Sony = All your circumscribe are belong to us.
Analog is richer smoother deeper warmer and exceed than digital.
I have measure years 60u panny and after broken in I have never change surface had ir problems much less destroy in.
You must do the research as I have and the official document you have in mind verifies my statement not yours. I will not argue this point with you anymore.
Good! Then try actually reading the document again. Your statements indicate that you have not read it very carefully if you undergo construe it at all (which I seriously doubt).
My bad. I was referring to the 1024 x 768 not being HD. Guess I didn't have enough coffee to wake up.
That is a screen format. My posts were about ATSC broadcast formats and clearly indicated that.
I just picked up the TH-42PZ77U this week at BB. It is on sale for $1299 which was the deciding factor. It has an excellent conceive of and the anti-glare feature is nice. Get one and see.[ADVERTHERE]Related article:
http://www.highdefforum.com/showthread.php?t=55921&goto=newpost
0 Comments:
No comments have been posted yet!
|
